RSS Feed

‘Politics’ Category

  1. Lefter 4: the Middle Class

    December 3, 2008 by emweb

    A few years ago my younger brother, who I respect and like, told me that the Middle Class basically paid all the taxes here yet was being squeezed continuously by successive governments. He said the Middle Class was shrinking and this was bad for New Zealand.

    I challenged him on this, and he annoyed me further by saying “Think about it. The Lower Class doesn’t, essentially, pay taxes because it earns too little or is actually costing money through benefits, education programs etcetera. Meanwhile the Upper Class will pay any amount of money to avoid paying taxes. That leaves the Middle Class carrying the tax burden — and the country.”

    I was angered at his words, due to my own working class pretensions, I suppose — but over the next couple of weeks, I realised he was essentially right. The Middle Class does carry the country and the tax burden. The Middle Class also produces professionals, artists, academics, educators, writers, managers, small business entrepreneurs … and New Zealand used to be renowned as a Middle Class society.

    And it did used to be, maybe up until the 1960s anyway, but over the last few decades the percentage fairly counted here as poor has risen dramatically, while the gap between the very rich and the rest has also widened dramatically. As a result, the Middle Class has not only been under financial pressure (for example, GST), but has been shrinking in size as members drop into the lower categories. This process may be about to accelerate as the debt burden, due to this current economic crisis, effects more people. 

    Side-stepping the issue that it was really bloody stupid for people to borrow so much money on so little equity just to have stuff they didn’t need, or ever bigger houses, for now, this perhaps-subconscious perception of stress probably added to the grasping at ‘lower tax’ straws that I think was short sighted. As call me old fashioned, but I don’t mind paying taxes as I quite like having roads, water, rail, power, schools — come to that, a defence force tat can help with disaster relief — and I like knowing that if I have an accident I will be cared for. Contrast that with my friend in Europe who had an accident on the motorway and nearly died because his medical care was so poor.

    This because, in amongst all the blood and mess, the doctors couldn’t find his medical insurance card so they got him out of the hospital next day, despite gaping wounds and multiple fractures, and he almost died of blood poisoning five days later. 

    Be proud to be Middle Class. It’s time we fought back.


  2. On greed

    November 26, 2008 by emweb

    Lefter 3

     

    Average-height poppies

    Last post I mentioned a fundamental difference between left and right philosophies. I wrote that, in a nutshell, left-wingers tend to put people first whereas right-wingers put money first. 

    You might think that means you ought to have a right wing accountant (I must note that my accountant is one of the coolest left-wing people I have ever met). But of course, if you put money first this world view can – and often does – lead to greed.

    I’m always conflicted on greed. I am a white Middle Class male living in a  Western Democracy. Almost by default that puts me in the upper percentile of wealth compared to humans on Planet Earth. Even if I lived on a benefit, that would still be the case. So am I greedy?

    I have to say, I’m no Mother Theresa. I won’t be leaving New Zealand to live in a slum to help people there. This is partly because I have no useful skills to pass on – I can’t make engines work or even swing a hammer very competently. I don’t know how to channel scarce water, and I’m terrible with gardens. The people I ought to help would probably end up looking after me, which would be a complete waste of resources.

    But of course it’s partly because I’m lazy and partly because I have a family here, in safe old, comfortable New Zealand. And it’s partly because I feel I can make more of a difference in the society I grew up in. 

    Anyway, what is greed? It’s usually defined as the excessive desire to acquire or possess more (especially more material wealth) than one needs or deserves. If you put that into your own context, it’s pretty clear pretty quickly who is greedy and who isn’t.

    I know New Zealand is supposed to be an ‘egalitarian’ society but it has always shocked me how much greed there is bubbling away under the surface. We teach our kids when they’re pre-schoolers to share. However, to become wealthy, you don’t share. You hoard. As adults, when we criticise the excesses of the wealthy, the usual riposte is that we’re exhibiting ‘tall poppy syndrome’. This implies we’re jealous; we’re trying to cut down the ‘tall poppies’ that have used personal wealth to place themselves above the rest.

    So in New Zealand, we’re expected to tell our children to share and control their greed, but we’re supposed to laud it in adults. This is absolute poppycock in the context of those who live lives of excess as the rewards of their personal (or inherited) spoils. A true tall poppy is someone who has added to their society.

    At this point, some people like to claim that rich people run businesses so they keep lots of people employed. Again, pure poppycock. To a wealthy business owner, materials are controlled and modified in the process of creating profits. 

    Workers are materials too, that’s all. If you weren’t making a profit for the owner for every hour you spend on the job, don’t kid yourself – you would not be there. And if greedy business owners think they can get more out of you without paying you more, they will, and the National Party in New Zealand has always assisted anti-employee and pro-owner practices. That’s why they hate the unions, designed solely to stand up for workers’ equitable conditions and wages. (And I know NZ unions have been victims of their own excess in the past, too.)

    Myself, I like to do a good job, to be thanked for it and to be paid fairly. 

    That’s all.


  3. Lefter 1

    November 13, 2008 by emweb

    The new government has been elected, and my beloved Grey Lynn is now part of a National-held electorate. For the first time ever. It makes me feel nauseous. The party of John Key all seems to toe the line “equality of opportunity, not of outcome”. In other words, if I present the same opportunity to a Remuera student and a same-age student from the Hokianga, that’s fair. What they do with that, well, who cares?

    Having the tools, upbringing and background to exploit and manage those opportunities is not considered, but since they don’t believe in equality of outcome, tough shit. Charming. Raise the class flag and go for your life. John Key can emerge from a solo-parent and state house background and, thanks to his overweening greed, become a millionaire, so why can’t you?

    Why should you, for goodness sake? Some people just aren’t greedy, John Key. They actually care about other people and their communities.